Strategy needs kill criteria
A choice is incomplete until leaders define the evidence that would make them stop.
3 MIN READ

Kill criteria protect a growth thesis from becoming identity and make capital allocation responsive to evidence.
Commitment changes interpretation
Once teams, targets and narratives form around a bet, ambiguous evidence is interpreted in its favor. Pre-agreed criteria preserve the option to learn before institutional incentives harden.
Define thresholds and dates
A useful criterion names the assumption, evidence, threshold, review date and decision owner. “We will monitor adoption” is not enough; the organization needs to know what level changes funding or scope.
Stopping can preserve the thesis
A failed route to market does not always invalidate the customer problem, and a weak assumption may not invalidate the entire opportunity. Criteria should show what exactly has been disproven.